Thursday, August 24, 2006

2x2 window shopping [Part-2]

Outside-In View

One of the most lingering side-effects of doing MBA is an undeniable fascination with putting things into 2x2 matrices. This is in continuation to last post where we saw different colours of Professors. Yes it’s the turn of students. Let’s put our house in order. This has again two dimensions: Taking yourself too seriously and Trying too hard. The interaction of the two gives us the following figure.



Phooka are dull, silent creatures, secure and self-righteous. Typically lacking in any sense of humour whatsoever, Phooka are usually content to live their own insular and smug lives, and rarely inflict their opinions on other people. However, they are extremely sensitive to things that they see as attacking their values / beliefs and are quick to take offense at things that are said against them. They have an almost morbid fear of being made to look ridiculous and are unappreciative of jokes at their expense. These fears / hurts express themselves as disengagement rather than confrontation, however - Phooka are the ultimate passive-aggressives. Because they are afraid of being shown up, Phooka will tend not to react openly to negative stimuli, preferring to let a simmering resentment grow within them. Interestingly, Phooka are often pious and 'sincere' though this is a fake sincerity that is based on complacency rather than humility. Because their puny brains are often incapable of dealing with contradiction, Phooka have trouble respecting / considering other people's opinions and prefer a 'simple' if suffocating world view where they are always right.

Goblins are possibly the most annoying of all creatures in this matrix. Opinionated and belligerent, Goblins will seek out views that run contrary to their own without provocation, and proceed to attack them with all the bitterness they can muster. While Goblins may often be full of biting wit, they have no real sense of humour, simply because they will never make (and usually cannot take) jokes at their own expense - humour to them is more a weapon than a toy. Driven by insecurity, Goblins will constantly seek opportunities to assert their own points of view, but will be unwilling to listen to others and will react to opposing positions based more on emotional frenzy than on rational thought. Goblins will never admit to being wrong. Logic is wasted on Goblins because they are selective listeners and will use it only to support conclusions that favour them - never considering how the same argument could be used against them. Goblins are incapable of seeing things from the other point of view. The average Goblin suffers from a strong persecution complex and is extremely self-involved - to the point of assuming that everything in the world is somehow about him/ her.

Pixies are the featherbrains of the world. Generous and good of heart, Pixies are anxious to please and desperate for acceptance. Rather than being self-involved, Pixies are infact almost entirely externally involved - they often have no discernible opinions / talents / personalities of their own, but always seem to be in search of external validation. While they are the most likely to make jokes (including jokes about themselves) their jokes are usually more notable for their quantity rather than their quality. Pixies are wannabes - strivers have no real personality and usually an extremely limited depth of understanding about the things that they talk about - yet silence makes them uncomfortable and they are often uncomfortable being alone. Unlike Goblins, who are convinced that everyone hates them, Pixies cannot stand the thought that anyone could hate them and are therefore almost self-effacing in their desire to please - they arrange away confrontations. While pixies may have little faith in their own worth, they may often be convinced that other people find them charming and intelligent and believe that effort is all it takes to be respected - not realising how silly and cloying they may seem. Pixies can be annoying, but you cannot bring yourself to hate them - you know that they mean well and you often like them, but you cannot begin to take them seriously.

Dwarves are, of course, the most aspirational of all the life-forms in this model. Like Phooka, Dwarves are little concerned with what other people think about them, but unlike Phooka they are secure enough to admit that other people could be right. Dwarves have a great sense of humour and will laugh at themselves as much as they will laugh at others - they are intensely aware of both the world's absurdity and of their own ridiculousness. Frequently clever and talented, Dwarves use these gifts in a whimsical manner, often more interested in the effects / process than in the final meaning of what they come in with. Relativists by nature, Dwarves are uncomfortable with moral absolutes, and tend to take a more contingent view of the world. While they may often be interested in arts and culture, Dwarves seek these out more for their own pleasure than in order to impress others / be accepted by them. Even though they recognise that they might be wrong, Dwarves are not afraid to state their opinions on various issues, though they may be willing to change this opinion if they find a convincing argument that suggests a better one. Open and friendly, Dwarves have strong personalities, but see no reason to inflict them on other people unless asked to.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

2x2 window shopping

As I step into second year of my course, I look back to the value addition in me after having completed one year. The major difference between an MBA and non-MBA is that when faced with a problem, former always strives to do things in an organised way whereas latter’s mind is cluttered with many ideas. No sooner has a problem presented itself; an MBA will always try to separate the essentials from the non-essentials and then give structure to his thoughts. But the irony is, this structured problem solving skill doesn’t guarantee positive results and vice-versa.

MBA is like preparing yourself for war, a corporate warfare. The more tools you know, the more equipped you are for the battle. The problem is, there is no Brahmastra (one pill for all ills) and one should know when to use which tools. After having gone through the countless physical and mental exercises in brain-washing OB classes etc. one of the foremost tool (remedy for all in-campus ills) that we learnt is the art of using 2x2 matrix or 2-d axes (or nxn matrix depending on the number of variables affecting the problem). There's something strangely comforting about being able to fit everything into those four little squares - as if the world were at once controllable and interesting.

This is not about trying to be clever - it's just how some of us naturally think. Gone are the engineering days when he waited for the rose-day with 1-d mindset when he spent time plucking petals from rose saying 'she loves me / she loves me not'. Now he tries this seemingly difficult problem in a methodical way by casting a 2x2 matrix with 'She loves me' one axis and 'I love her' on the other and classify all the women he knows along those two dimensions! Let’s not talk about the outcome as I already mentioned the irony.

A class forms of two essentials entities, Professors and Students. It’s like a game of kathputli where in order to run the show its prerogative to have the five fingers unequal. i am thankful to my classmates and professors for their heterogeneity. One learns to sit hours after hours, in those endless lectures, killing time in the hope of some enlightenment, that the Prof would rub-off of their intellectual prowess.

Inside-Out View

Let’s understand the situation with a 2x2 matrix. The Professors. Essentially this elegantly simple classification scheme has two dimensions: Knowledge Quotient and Tyrant Quotient. Both these parameters are further classified as high and low and the interaction of the two gives us the following figure.



Sepia are self-righteous and rigid till the students confuse them. They have their viewpoints and seem to be oblivious of uncalled subjectivity. Although they pretend to hold their ground till the end, external validation is crucial to keep themselves motivated. Its not that they don’t harbour the desire of changing their image from frivolous to tyrant but their desire is clipped by their insufficient knowledge and the morbid fear of getting cornered themselves if they go hunting. They are the most hated ones but nonetheless given artificial respect by the students as the grades depend on their whims and fancies. This makes student’s reactions all the more interesting. Typically, students tend to show a lot of ‘after-class’ and ‘before-class’ participation, to get marks for ‘in-class’ participation. For their subjects, entire learning boils down to quizzes, presentations, assignments etc. as the involvement of the Profs are minimal/zero. All the students sit absent-minded and dull whereas the Prof feels that student are mentally alert.

Eastman are respected by the students and cared by the administration, not because of their treasure of knowledge but because they are endangered species. They have all the ingredients what it takes to become ‘God level Profs’. Like Sepia, Eastmen craves for the superiority but unlike Sepia, they can turn their dreams to reality, so what if that turns out to be a nightmare for the students. But it’s sad that the students don’t take the advantage from them. It’s not all their mistake because they have become irrcorrigible as greater number of Profs belongs to other categories. Mostly these Demigods frequent the college in the late evening or on Sundays, when the students have already run out of their steam or are busy calculating the opportunity cost of missing out on the extra-curricular activities in the weekends.

Tints are possibly the most liked among all the types. They don’t waste single minute of class in negative energy and don’t crave for external validation of their hard work either. They have unique style of delivery and students love to imitate them. Generally they have a smiling face and they connect with the students so well that the students don’t feel the pressure. So the premise that they are less tyrant may not be entirely true. They are respected and remembered for a long time. Having said that, the students can get carried away and the possibility of the Prof being taken for a ride is not totally ruled out in some cases.

B&W are also hated but not to the extent of Sepia. On the contrary, students love to reciprocate the mercy shown by them. Often, they are amazing speakers (because often that’s the only highlighting factor) who can speak for hours without making sense. Unlike Sepia they don’t crave for external validation as deep down inside they know that students are aware of their quality and admire them for their patience. They don’t mind humour at their expense and seldom force themselves on the students. If the subjects delivered by them are compulsory for the course, we curse the administration and if it’s optional we curse ourselves, but the Prof almost always gets away unscathed.

***

You would be curious to know how this works for the students. That would be more interesting and relevant. But that’s coming in the next post.

2x2 window shopping Part-2 follows.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

the deluge

the disorder...

the scare...

the ecstasy...

picture says thousands words...